HLTH 688WProfessional Writing and Presentations
Spring 2004
4:00
– 6:30 PM, Tuesdays
Room: HHP 0303
Class Website: www.phi.umd.edu/who/hlth688w
| Instructor |
Dr. Nancy L. Atkinson |
Office |
1240 G HHP |
|
Phone |
(301) 405-2522 |
|
atkinson@umd.edu |
|
Office hours: |
2 p.m. to 4 p.m.Tuesdays & Thursdays | ||
Course Description: The purpose of this course is to acquaint students with a variety of types of professional writing required of public health professionals, including: grant proposals; journal articles; textbooks; presentation proposals and papers; and theses and dissertations. The scope of the course includes both the form and content of a range of technical documents as well as the processes of writing, peer review, and critique.
General Course Objectives
By the end of this course, each student will be able to:
Required Textbooks & Materials
Dictionary and thesaurus of your choice.
Manning, T., Algozzine, B., & Antonak, R. (2003). Guide for Preparing a Thesis or Dissertation. PNG Publications: Morgantown, West Virginia.
Browner, W.S. (1999). Publishing and Presenting Clinical Research. Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Online Materials
Online dictionaries, thesaurus, and Elements of Style: Through UMD Library accessed via on campus computer at the Online Reference Shelf http://www.lib.umd.edu/ETC/Reference.html
Writer’s Reference website: Interactive activities and other online resources http://www.bedfordstmartins.com/hacker/writersref/
APA Style Tips: Removing Bias in Language http://www.apastyle.org/styletips.html
PHS 398 Grant Application Kit http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.html
University of Maryland Grant Proposal Handbook http://www.umresearch.umd.edu/ORAA/prop_prep/
NIAID "All About Grants" Tutorials http://www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/grants/
Department of Behavioral and Community Health Disseratation Guidelines http://www.hhp.umd.edu/dpch/grad/degree.html#dissertation
University of Maryland Departmental Human Subjects Review Committee Application Form http://www.umresearch.umd.edu/ORAA/forms/HSRCDEPT_21NOV03.pdf
University of Maryland: Initial IRB Application Form http://www.umresearch.umd.edu/ORAA/forms/IRB_Initial_29OCT03.pdf
Course Outline
|
Class |
Topic |
In-Class Activities |
Reading Assignment |
|
1/27/04 |
Course introduction; basic principles; assessment of writing strengths and weaknesses |
Basic principles Self-assessment |
Browner, Chapter 1 |
|
2/3/04 |
Fundamentals of peer review and critique; gender neutral language. |
Removing gender-biased language tutorial |
APA Style Tips: Removing Bias in Language |
|
2/10/04 |
Coping with writing blocks and phobia; more on peer review, critique, and evaluation |
Writing goals |
Browner, Chapter 14 |
|
2/17/04 |
Journal articles: form and content. What do reviewers look for? |
Browner, Chapter 3 & 10 | |
|
2/24/04 |
More on journal articles |
Review author guidelines |
Browner, Chapter 8 & 13 |
| 3/2/04 | Presentation proposals: form and content. What do reviewers look for? |
Review GRID & TWT author guidelines; Review APHA abstracts |
Browner, Chapter 2 |
| 3/9/04 | Grant and contract proposals: form and content. What do reviewers look for? | PHS 398 Application Kit | |
|
3/16/04 |
Midterm Exam; catch up |
Midterm |
None |
|
3/23/04 |
Spring Break | ||
|
3/30/04 |
More on grant and contract proposals; sources of funding, budget justification, management plan |
UMD Grant Proposal Handbook | |
|
4/6/04 |
Characteristics of effective professional presentations |
Hands-on PowerPoint tutorial | Browner, Chapter 11 & 12 |
|
4/13/04 |
Theses and dissertations: form and content. What do faculty look for? |
Presentation dry runs |
Manning et al., pp. 1-12, 21-50, Appendix C |
|
4/20/04 |
More on theses and dissertations |
Presentation dry runs |
HLTH Dissertation Guidelines |
|
4/27/04 |
Human subjects review: form and content. What do reviewers look for? |
Human subjects online tutorial |
Manning et al., pp. 13-20; Appendix B |
|
5/4/04 |
Textbooks: form and content. What do publishers look for? |
Interests and expertise inventory | |
|
5/11/04 |
Writing a prospectus for a publisher; course evaluations |
||
|
5/18/04 |
Final Exam |
||
Course Requirements
This course requires a great deal of writing both in-class and out-of-class, as well as review and critique of the work of others, both published and unpublished. Some of the writing assignments are to be done individually, and others require the collaboration of small groups of students.
It is expected that students will prepare all writing assignments using a computer and word processing software of their choice. If you are not comfortable in using a computer for this purpose, please discuss this with the instructor. You will be provided with a list of campus resources that will assist you in developing the needed computer skills.
1. Class Participation
Maintaining an active presence in class will prepare you to learn the content and to be successful in your class assignments. It includes:
Missing more than 5 hours of class time will necessitate the re-taking of this course. If missing class is due to extenuating circumstances that can be documented, the instructor may grant an “I” (incomplete) grade for the course. Active class participation will be the deciding factor in borderline grades.
2. Midterm and Final Exams
Exams will be used to evaluate the students’ mastery of the didactic material presented in class and through reading assignments. The midterm exam will be taken in the college microcomputer laboratory, and students will have the choice of using either PC or Macintosh computers.
3. Short writing assignments
4. Individual Project
This assignment is designed to provide the student with an opportunity to produce a piece of professional writing that serves a purpose beyond achieving a grade in this course. Students are free to choose any of the following writing options depending on their personal interests and goals:
As part of the creation of the individual project, students must submit a proposal to be reviewed and approved by peers and the instructor (2/17/04). They must also submit their draft paper to a peer for review, so drafts are due on 3/30/04 (one copy to peer reviewer, and one copy to instructor). Final papers are due the last day of class before the exam (5/11/04).
5. Presentation Project
Students will have an opportunity to propose and present an individual paper in a professional venue during the course. The course assignments have been designed to correspond with the university's Graduate Research Interaction Day. The project has three steps:
6. Group Writing Project
Although students are expected to work together in pairs and groups, there is no group assignment this semester. Enjoy!
Grading
The final semester grade will be determined by:
|
Assignment |
Percentage |
|
Class participation |
15% |
|
Midterm and final |
20% |
|
6 short writing assignments |
30% |
|
Individual writing project |
20% |
|
Presentation project |
15% |
If you have a
documented disability and require special accomodations, please see the
instructor.
You will need documentation from the Disability Support
Service (301-314-7682)
Code of Academic Integrity
The University is an academic community. Its fundamental purpose is the pursuit of knowledge. Like all other communities, the University can function properly only if its members adhere to clearly established goals and values. Essential to the fundamental purpose of the University is the commitment to the principles of truth and academic honesty. Accordingly, The Code of Academic Integrity is designed to ensure that the principle of academic honesty is upheld. While all members of the University share this responsibility, The Code of Academic Integrity is designed so that special responsibility for upholding the principle of academic honesty lies with the students.
ACADEMIC DISHONESTY:
any of the following acts, when committed by a student, shall constitute
academic dishonesty:
CHEATING: intentionally using or attempting to
use unauthorized materials, information, or study aids in any academic exercise.
FABRICATION: intentional and unauthorized falsification or invention
of any information or citation in an academic exercise.
FACILITATING
ACADEMIC DISHONESTY: intentionally or knowingly helping or attempting to
help another to violate any provision of this Code.
PLAGIARISM:
intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one's
own in any academic exercise.
All students are expected to adhere to the Code of Academic Integrity.
All violations of the Code will be referred to the Student Honor Council.